
Somehow I totally missed that this was coming out (or perhaps Trent just dropped it outta nowhere). But last night, Ghosts (the mp3's at least) were released. I've been letting it cycle through all night. Basically what you get is 36 tracks that essentially is wannabe Berlin-Era-Bowie tunes. Sometimes that much is painfully (or embarassingly?) obvious. It's all instrumental. When I first heard of the sheer volume of tunes (36?!) and 'instrumental' my first hunch was that this was going to be nothing more than outtakes and unusable sequences that didn't fit on any of his recent outtings. After a couple times through each track...I don't think that's what we get. In fact, I'll go as far as to say its actually not half bad. I've caught a few instances where he's either quoting or straight up rehashing old Fragile tunes, but you'll have that I guess. It certainly doesn't measure up to Callisto whatsoever, but I don't know that was Trent's intention.
That said...now that Trent is 'out of his contract' I suppose this is what we're in for. Massive doses of output that he can put out whenever it suits his fancy (of course, all the people downloading these proceeded to crash his site..good job kids). I know what you're thinking: "dave, how on earth would the single most pretentious artist this side of Prince sleep knowing his output was merely in the form of mp3's?". Well true to form, you can buy this collection of instrumentals in various hardcopy versions...one of which is a $300 (really?!) "collectors edition" that includes vinyls (seriously?!) of all these tracks. I find that funny because I don't know of a single vinyl enthusiast (save for maybe a couple DJ's) that would give two shits and a rolling donut about a new NIN album on vinyl (much less anything post Fragile). There's a lot of analog synthy sounds that prolly do sound pretty fat on vinyl, but certainly not $300 fat.
that said, the $5 you spend to get all these is most certainly worth it. It's good background music...not to engaging, and nothing here that is going to win over any uninitiated (as I imagine anybody who is a fan of the Bowie/Eno stuff probably is well aware of what Trent's been doing the past 18 odd years).
This whole 'direct release' thing like what NIN, Radiohead and others are doing is proving to be an interesting situation. On one hand, this definitely makes it easier for Trent to get work out. On the other, not having a label in there acting as a filter between the end listener and the artist could be a bad thing. I don't care who the artist is, everybody has good work and shitty work. Labels have served to some extent as a quality control because they are only interested in music they can sell (for better or for worse I guess...but I've heard plenty of stories from artists who can't put an album out because the label 'doesn't hear a single'). Maybe that is kind of a good thing? Cos while I can't say for sure, I'm pretty sure Trent couldn't release an album with 36 instrumental tracks on Interscope. Not in the form he's doing it now. And of these 36, I'd say 15 of 'em sound like self-indulgent experiments. Basically they don't serve to benefit the overall output. I know with my own work, the first IK album could ahve been 4-5 songs thinner and thus, a way more effective album. But self releasing it as we did...we just put out everything we had committed to tape.
So...eh..if ya wanna hear Trent make a bunch of noises with some standouts here and there...this is definitely worth your 5 bucks (better pay up too cos now Trent's got a big old bandwidth bill haha)
Comments (5)
Good, I've been waiting for this album for a while. I like his music... just not his singing...
Posted by Schmüdde | March 4, 2008 12:34 AM
Posted on March 4, 2008 00:34
One more thing. The most unusual thing about this release is that he did it without any press whatsoever. Which means that some asshole at Rolling Stone didn't get any sort of pre-release on it and that a dude at a blog named "Thought Sausage" broke the news to me. And NIN still ended up having 3x the traffic they expected!
Then again, checking out rollingstone.com right now (3/4/07): The headline is American Idol: Season so Far and a article why the Surge in Iraq is failing. *yawn* What year did this magazine get to be a bunch of fucking puppets?
You've always been more credible than Rolling Stone anyway, Dave.
Posted by Schmüdde | March 4, 2008 9:58 AM
Posted on March 4, 2008 09:58
I think it occured sometime in the mid 90's when one generation was dying off cos of their habits and another one was thinking rock 'n roll was something new (no that's not my quote...but valid no less!).
But that said...yeah I wouldn't give an iota of credibility to what a Rolling Stone review says of music like this. It's not even close to commercial. It also bears mentioning that when Radiohead did their big release, they put the whole media hoopla behind it. That seemed way more contrived than what it looks like Trent did here (and guys like me get to spread the word). Maybe working with 42Entertainment taught him a thing or two eh?
That said...I've had it on the ipod since I got to work this morning, and it isn't "growing" on me or anything. The more I listen to it, the more it sounds like the back half of Low and Heroes. Not just the samples/noises, but the song structures. Not that each of us hasn't attempted to create our own versions of Low, but c'mon 4 albums of it?!
Posted by Dave McAnally | March 4, 2008 10:15 AM
Posted on March 4, 2008 10:15
"...true to form, you can buy this collection of instrumentals in various hardcopy versions...one of which is a $300 (really?!) "collectors edition" that includes vinyls (seriously?!) of all these tracks..."
Funny question for you
what is the sonic advantage of transfering audio recorded digital onto an analog medium?
The answer: There ain't fucking one
Posted by Sam | March 4, 2008 3:12 PM
Posted on March 4, 2008 15:12
Heh,
Yeah I always figured putting something like Brighter Than Creation's Dark on vinyl, when it was recorded as if it were 1975 makes sense.
Posted by Dave McAnally | March 4, 2008 3:26 PM
Posted on March 4, 2008 15:26